Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Pfizer continued their program of using Israelis as lab rats this week as Israel became the first country in the world to authorize a third COVID-19 “vaccine” for those who have already received two Pfizer mRNA shots, beginning with people over the age of 60.
In what’s a likely sign of things to come elsewhere, Israel is now pushing a third jab, or follow-up booster for those who’ve already received their two vaccine rounds, for the elderly people over the age of 60.
Israel’s prominent Haaretz newspaper revealed Thursday the country will be the first in the world to start doing so after government approval, writing that Israel “will start offering a third COVID vaccine shot to people over 60 starting on Sunday, after the Health Ministry approved the move on Thursday.”
“The booster shots will be given to those over 60 who received their second dose at least five months ago. Israel is the first country to announce that it will begin giving booster shots,” the report says.
Israeli President Naftali Bennet unveiled the plan to the nation in a televised address:
“I’m announcing this evening the beginning of the campaign to receive the booster vaccine, the third vaccine,” Bennett said.
“Reality proves the vaccines are safe. Reality also proves the vaccines protects from severe morbidity and death.
And like the flu vaccine that needs to be renewed from time to time, it is the same in this case.”
Read the full article at ZeroHedge News.
Earlier this year Vera Sharav, a holocaust survivor, reported how the Israeli government had reached an agreement with Pfizer to vaccinate as many people in Israel as quickly as possible and monitor the results, selling out their citizens as “lab rats.”
See our previous coverage on this issue:
Israelis Cry Out to the World to Stop Mandatory COVID Injections as Lawsuit is Filed in International Criminal Court Over Nuremberg Code Violation
It appears that now the Israeli people will also be the first to be tested with a third injection, as Israeli President Naftali Bennet confirmed what most of us expected: there will be constant COVID-19 booster shots just like the annual flu shots.
Mordechai Sones, with America’s Frontline Doctors, interviewed security expert Ehden Biber this week who claims to have recovered unredacted contracts between Pfizer and world governments which he claims required these countries to ban or make illegal existing treatments for COVID-19, such as Ivermectin, to be able to distribute Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 injections.
Information security expert on revealed Pfizer agreements: ‘There’s good reason Pfizer fought to hide the details of these contracts’
“If you were wondering why Ivermectin was suppressed, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID-19, the contract cannot be voided.”
by Mordechai Sones
Unredacted contracts for the experimental biological agent known as the “COVID-19 vaccine” between the Pfizer corporation and various governments continue to be revealed.
Information security expert Ehden Biber told America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) Frontline News that the first document to recently emerge was discovered by Albanian newspaper Gogo.al. Biber then was able to locate the digitally-signed Brazilian contract, and at least two others, one with the European Commission, and the other with the Dominican Republic.
AFLDS Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon responded to the revelations after perusing the Albania contract, saying it “looks genuine.” He continued: “I know the basic anatomy of these agreements and nothing is missing that I’d expect to be present, and I’ve seen no clues that suggests it’s fake.”
Yeadon noted what he found “the most stunning revelation,” citing the clause that stipulates “if there are any laws or regulations in your country under which Pfizer could be prosecuted, you agree to CHANGE THE LAW OR REGULATION to close that off.” (emphasis his)
In a Twitter thread that has since been removed except the first tweet in the thread, Biber explained the significance of the revealed agreements: “Because the cost of developing contracts is very high and time consuming (legal review cycles), Pfizer, like all corporations, develop a standardized agreement template and use these agreements with relatively minor adjustments in different countries.
“These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, so I managed to get a hold of a copy.
“As you are about to see, there is a good reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts.”
Both heads of state entered into secret contracts with vaccine manufacturers.
Both failed to disclose to their constituents that the COVID-19 (mRNA) vaccines are experimental.
- The COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 clinical trials have not yet been completed.
- This is why both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines have NOT been licensed by the FDA. Both vaccines received “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA): “a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures…Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products.”[i]
- The safety of these experimental vaccines has not been established during the frenzied pace of production and distribution. The sheer speed at which the vaccines were developed and tested precluded obtaining sufficient information about adverse side effects; in particular, serious, long term adverse effects.
- Furthermore, mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental.[ii] No other vaccines using this technology have been approved. The long-term risks are unknown.
- As of January 27, 2021, Johns Hopkins’ tracking system states that the infection fatality rate in the U.S. is 1.7%; in Israel it is 0.7%.[iii]
According to the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), as of Dec. 18, 2020 (just when mass vaccinations began), the adverse event rate following Covid-19 vaccination was 2.79%.[iv]
This would indicate that the short-term risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than the risk of dying from COVID-19.