Why an RBA-issued crypto-like currency could soon be a reality
The RBA is piloting a central bank-baked digital currency.
Published August 9, 3:55 pm AEST
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services.
Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more.
Key points
- The RBA has announced it will be working on a pilot that will see a central bank-backed digital currency used in a closed loop system
- A program is kicking off to identify potential uses and benefits of such a currency and to develop the pilot
- It’s expected to last around a year
In what might seem like a dream to crypto fans, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is exploring whether the nation would benefit from a digital form of the Australian Dollar.
It will be a far cry from the example set by El Salvador. The nation adopted Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) as legal tender in 2021.
Instead, the RBA plans to create its own digital currency, dubbed central bank digital currency (CBDC), as part of a trial. To do so, it’s collaborating with the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre (DFCRC).
The pair will work on a pilot that will ultimately see the CBDC used in a ring-fenced environment.
Let’s take a closer look at the RBA’s latest pivot towards cryptocurrency-style tokens.
Could Australia soon have its own crypto-like currency?
Australia’s central bank is looking into creating its own digital currency, testing potential uses and benefits in a pilot program.
However, crypto fans might not want to get too excited. The RBA’s digital currency, unlike cryptocurrency, will be backed by the central bank. Thus, It will work just like the Australian Dollar.
RBA deputy governor Michelle Bullock reportedly told ABC’s The World Today that the pilot’s participants will purchase and use CBDC in a “closed loop” system. She continued:
I suspect where its role might be more important is perhaps in delivery versus payment for physical assets.
Possibly things like property, possibly things like gold — these sorts of things that might give businesses an opportunity to exchange real assets on a digital ledger for currency on a digital ledger.
A project that will oversee the development of the pilot is expected to take around a year.
It will look into innovative uses for a CBDC and business models that could be supported by its issuance. Finally, the project will consider some of the technical, legal, and regulatory considerations associated with a CBDC.
A paper will be published in the next few months further explaining the project. It will also detail how industry participants will be able to engage in the program.
DFCRC CEO Dr Andreas Furche commented on the research project, saying:
CBDC is no longer a question of technological feasibility.
The key research questions now are what economic benefits a CBDC could enable, and how it could be designed to maximise those benefits.
Coercion Code - "Dark Times are upon us" 
China has been working on this for years and it is still in beta as it has numerous issues. Do you think that a totalitarian regime would have not instigated this if they could have? That is their dream. However it is not working and could take many years. My prediction (now I speculate) is the world financial markets will collapse in the next few months – October and then we are in for a depression and perhaps after that they will try it on. However it is still fiat currency so all the same problems. Being fully electronic is irrelevant. It is still fiat and worthless. See Rafi Farber on you tube – some good stuff but in the end the only certainty is Gods Word – Get the 1611 Authorised King James Bible and not the kjv corruption from 1769 which would not have been authorised because he was long dead (James) I have compared the modern kjv and it is not the same as the 1611. Get it and read it. Hendrickson publish a 1611 at Koorong books for example. All others are Babylonian bibles made for copyright and $$$ not inspired and are inconsistent.
Hi Hu
I am unsure what the key benefits would be to purchase a 1611 bible based on the range of challenges from the typeset to the use of different letters U for V, …f for s, and if its because of some code or choice of words …then please expand or explain what is missing from 1769 version
Thanks